[Essay 4] Books vs. experience
In the past, there used to be a popular belief that all the wisdom of the world was contained in the books. Today, practical people are aware that books can only give guidlines, but they cannot predict or prevent the real courses of events. I fully agree with the statement that experience provides more knowledge than books do. The reasons and examples listed below will support my view
First of all, in the prehistoric times, when literature and books was not invented yet, people used to gain knowledge only from their experience. They used to observe animal's behaviors in different situations so they become acquainted with animal's habits and tempers. These observations have lead to the knowledge that helps early people become more effective hunters. It wasn't until later that they started drawing pictures on the caves' walls, which was the first pieces of literary art because these drawings narrated different stories.
Secondly, if we come back to the present, we can see that things have not changed too much in the early years of human life. For instance, scientific researchers have found that babies start getting to know everything around them from the very moment they came into this world. They also explore the new world by using the "primitive" methods such as touching, listening and observing. For the first six years, they gain knowledge mainly from experience.
Broadly speaking, there is a major difference between knowledge gained from experience and that gained from books. A book only offers a theoretical aspects on an issue while experiences are more pratical. Although, there are literary pieces whose impact on the readers is exceptionally strong, every story is read and then forgotten because these stories do not concern the reader's personal life experience. This is the main advantage of experience over books: personal involvement in a situation is a better teacher than any lesson contained in even the best book.
In addition, there is another aspect of knnowledge gained from books that I would like to discuss : their indifference to personality. This is to say that books may contain world known truths, but they may not be suitable for everyone. For example, a person cannot become an architect by only reading books about how to create blueprints and strong buildings. Because these books cannot give the individual creativity and imagination which are improtant qualities for an architect. It is up to an architect's creativity and individuality to turn a simple idea into a masterpiece.
In sum, I accept that books are incomparable source of knowledge and wisdom, but mankind has a proverb saying "seeing is believing", which describes the importance of experience. This is the reason why I assume that the most valuable knowledge come from personal experience.
Nguyễn Văn Hải
Phổ thôngIn the past, there used to be a popular belief that all the wisdom of the world was contained in the books. Today, practical people are aware that books can only give guidlines, but they cannot predict or prevent the real courses of events. I fully agree with the statement that experience provides more knowledge than books do. The reasons and examples listed below will support my view
First of all, in the prehistoric (ages / periods / time) times, when literature and books (were) was not invented yet, people used to gain knowledge only from their experience. They used to observe animal's (animals') behaviors in different situations so they become acquainted with animal's (animals') habits and tempers. These observations have (led) lead to the knowledge that helps early people become more effective hunters. It wasn't until later that they started drawing pictures on the caves' walls, which (were) was the first pieces of literary art because these drawings narrated different stories.
Secondly, if we come back to the present, we can see that things have not changed too much in the early years of human life. For instance, scientific researchers have found that babies start getting to know everything around them from the very moment they came (come, sự thật hiển nhiên, còn nếu bạn muốn dùng quá khứ thì "started" ở trên cũng nên cùng thì) into this world. They also explore the new world by using the "primitive" methods such as touching, listening and observing. For the first six years, they gain knowledge mainly from experience.
Broadly speaking, there is a major difference between knowledge gained from experience and that gained from books. A book only offers a theoretical aspects on an issue while experiences are more pra(c)tical. Although, there are literary pieces whose impact on the readers is exceptionally strong, every story is read and then forgotten because these stories do not concern the (readers' {đọc giả nói chung}) reader's personal life experience. This is the main advantage of experience (with / of) over books: personal involvement in a situation is a better teacher than any lesson(s) contained in even the best book(s) (hoặc a best book).
In addition, there is another aspect of knnowledge gained from books that I would like to discuss : their (sở hữu này bạn ngụ ý thay cho chủ từ nào phía trước, nếu được thì chuyển qua "its") indifference to personality. This is to say that books may contain world known truths, but they may not be suitable for everyone. For example, a person cannot become an architect by only reading books about how to create blueprints and strong buildings. Bbecause these books cannot give the individual creativity and imagination which are improtant qualities for an architect. It is up to an architect's creativity and individuality to turn a simple idea into a masterpiece.
In sum, I accept that books are (an) incomparable source of knowledge and wisdom, but mankind has a proverb saying "seeing is believing", which describes the importance of experience. This is the reason why I assume that the most valuable knowledge come(s) from personal experience.
Góp ý với Thiên chút vậy nhé. Chắc bạn đang luyện cấp TOEFL or IELTS phải không, mấy bài bạn viết chứng tỏ bạn có kiến thức nền và tiếng Anh tốt.