Trần Thị Thủy Tiên
Is the death penalty efficient?
Some countries still have the death penalty while others prefer to use other methods, maybe sentence prisoners to life imprisonment. Although the death sentence no longer exists in Britain, after a particularly violent murder, British people sometimes call for it to be brought back. In my opinion, the death penalty should be defended for a number of reasons.
The first reason is that the death penalty acts as a deterrent. Dangerous criminals will think twice about committing a serious crime, that if they bring their weapons, these things will lead to the incident that they will kill people, and that they will end their lives. Therefore, robbers will leave their guns at home and become odinary robbers. Moreover, if cruel murderers are not killed, they will set bad example. You offenders and petty criminals, or even ordinary people and people that their families and friends have never thought that they will become murderers, will carry guns everywhere and they can kill a lot of people everytime without having a thought.
The second reason is that if criminals are sentenced to death, they will not be released from prison, and they will not continue to commit serious crimes. If they are lifers, they will not be in prison for the rest of their lives, they are just in prison for twenty to thirty years, and then they will be released. In prison, they will make more friends that are very dangerous criminals. These criminals will "exchange" their "experiences about killing people", and when they are freedom, they will make plans together to commit more crimes that can called tragedies. Thus, guilty people will become more guilty.
Those who are against these ideas may assert that the capital punishment is not humane, and that if it is wrong for one individual to murder another then it is also wrong for the state to execute and individual. However, one criminal kills so many victims, why don't we think about these victims who are completely innocent? Is it innocent if a lot of other innocent people die? Is it innocent if the gorvenment does not kill these inhuman criminals and let them to end many innocent people's lives ?
Taking everything into account, I believe that the death penalty should not be abolished at all, they should be brought back. We must exterminate serious offence completely and bestial people should surely not exist in our civilized world
Nguyễn Văn Hải
Phổ thôngGood essay, yet there're some spelling errors in the text, such as:
............ And that they will end other people's lives (and that they will end their lives). "They refer to criminals"
........... become ordinary robbers (instead of odinary ....)
......... they will set a bad example (with "a" before "bad example", or "bad examples")
You offenders and petty criminals........
every time without having a thought (instead of "everytime")
.....and when they have the freedom (or "when they are free")
..... commit more crimes that can be called tragedies
Those who are against these ideas may assert that the capital punishment is not humane, and that if it is wrong for one individual to murder another then it is also wrong for the state to execute and individual. (pls have an explanation for this sentence,it's hard to understand).
the government (instead of gorvenment)